Luke 5:1-11
Luke 5
The Calling of the First Disciples
1One day as Jesus was standing by the Lake of Gennesaret, with the people crowding around him and listening to the word of God, 2he saw at the water's edge two boats, left there by the fishermen, who were washing their nets. 3He got into one of the boats, the one belonging to Simon, and asked him to put out a little from shore. Then he sat down and taught the people from the boat.
4When he had finished speaking, he said to Simon, "Put out into deep water, and let down the nets for a catch."
5Simon answered, "Master, we've worked hard all night and haven't caught anything. But because you say so, I will let down the nets."
6When they had done so, they caught such a large number of fish that their nets began to break. 7So they signaled their partners in the other boat to come and help them, and they came and filled both boats so full that they began to sink.
8When Simon Peter saw this, he fell at Jesus' knees and said, "Go away from me, Lord; I am a sinful man!" 9For he and all his companions were astonished at the catch of fish they had taken, 10and so were James and John, the sons of Zebedee, Simon's partners.
Then Jesus said to Simon, "Don't be afraid; from now on you will catch men." 11So they pulled their boats up on shore, left everything and followed him.
-----------------
This is only 11 verses, but I think it's important enough (and gets skimmed over enough) that it deserves a post of its own.
We see in the first couple of verses here that Jesus is already a very popular teacher. People are crowding around him to hear him speak, and they generally just want to be near him. He borrows a boat from someone to use a "speaking platform."
After teaching, he amazes the fishermen by allowing them to catch a HUGE amount of fish. They hadn't caught a thing all night, and now they had so much, their nets could barely hold it all.
Simon Peter is so convinced of Jesus' power that he falls to the ground and says, "Go away from me Lord; I am a sinful man!"
Back in a post about Luke 2, I jumped the gun and wrote about the calling of Jesus' disciples. I think some of it is worth repeating here:
- At the end of Bet Talmud, only the best and brightest were still studying. The majority had gone home to begin learning the family trade (farming, fishing, whatever). The remaining few would apply to a well-known rabbi to become one of his talmidim (disciples). Kind of like an internship, I suppose. This level of education was called Bet Midrash ("House of Study").
If a rabbi accepted you as a talmidim, you'd follow him around everywhere. You'd want to be just like him. You'd learn everything you could from him. Your life would be devoted to learning how to do what the rabbi did. Only the best were accepted as talmidim. If the rabbi believed that a kid had what it took, he would say, "Come, follow me."
But many weren't good enough. A rabbi very well might say, "You aren't good enough. Go home and learn the family business."
It was at the age of 30 that a rabbi would generally begin his public teaching and training of disciples. This is the age we'll see Jesus begin his ministry.
The last, yet perhaps most interesting thing we'll see later is when Jesus begins to call his own disciples. His talmidim. Who does he call? The best and brightest students? The ones who follow him around and beg to be his talmidim?
No. He calls fishermen. People learning the family business, perhaps not even out of their teen years. Jesus calls the not-good-enoughs. Jesus says to them, "Come, follow me." Jesus believes they can be like him.

7 Comments:
The thing that has always struck me here is verse 11: "So they. . . left everything and followed him."
I often wonder, what did the disciples see when Jesus came and said, "Come, follow me", that made it seem even remotely sensible to 'drop everything and follow Him'? And, would I have recognized it if He'd said it to me?
But of course, knowing what we do now, if Jesus really is who He says He is, no other response makes sense; if He really is who He says He is, leaving everything to follow Him is the only thing that makes sense.
I like your observation about the people Jesus chose to ask to follow Him.
It gives me hope that He also wouldn't pass me by. :)
Now that we are seeing how immersed Jesus' life and ministry was in the culture and religious norms of His time, it brings a question to mind. This is something that I haven't made up my mind on, nor do I feel is particularly important/crucial to my faith or understanding of the Messiah, but yet, I wonder if He was married or at least betrothed to someone.
It would have been extremely odd in His time -- to the point of scandalous and unbelievable -- for a man to be considered a rabbi and not be married. Such was the esteem Israel had for marriage -- not only it's importance in the community, but for it's symbolic nature of the relationship they had with Adonai.
It's interesting to think about, anyway. I know that it became a bit of a hot topic around the whole DaVinci Code thing... but regardless of the book and it's propositions, the idea itself is not without merit.
I've discussed the topic of the possibility of Jesus' marriage with some people -- just the other night, actually. What I point out is that we really don't have any proof one way or another. The Bible is quiet on the subject. However, I've pointed out that it really would do no harm to our faith, and Christianity in general, if someday we found out that he was.
But many very well-read people pointed out to me that their is no basis to consider that he was. The Bible is quiet on the subject. He was traveling for three YEARS... If he was married, where was his wife? Along, but never mentioned? At home, while he was gone?
I concede that it's a remote possibility, and it does no real harm to our faith to consider it. (Although a single guy pointed out to me that it changes some of our ideas about marriage and it's importance to a Christian.) But because it was a cultural norm, doesn't necessarily mean he was.
I know women got married much younger, but many men were married later in life, right? Are you sure it would have been completely scandalous for him to not be married? Do you have a specific reference for that by any chance? I got the impression that later on, some people in early churches (Ephesus? or Phillipi? I don't remember) were eschewing marriage and sex perhaps to be like Jesus, and Paul had to set them straight that those things weren't necessarily bad.
Sorry so long to reply.
I'm with you in thinking that Jesus likely wasn't married but that it doesn't totally upset my foundation of faith if he was.
If He wasn't married, though, I would think it was likely a function of a Nazirite vow... which some people seem to think a likely situation. I can't think of their reasons off the top of my head, though.
I truly believe that at that time, it would have been unprecedented for a "rabbi" to be unmarried. Not that Jesus was a conformist in any way -- but the fact that others viewed him as a rabbi is interesting pertaining to the whole marriage-thing.
On the other hand, the instruction for "husbands to love their wives as Messiah loved the assembly of believers" seems a little less than pointed if, indeed, Jesus was married. I would think a more succinct text would be "husbands love your wives as Messiah loved His wife..." (not Scripture... in case anyone needs to know!)
All interesting stuff to ponder, though!
I forgot to mention that the injunction of all "teachers(rabbis) are required to be married" comes from the Mishnah. (a segment of the Oral Law)
This certainly isn't conclusive evidence to Jesus' marital state, just a wrench to throw into Orthodoxy.
It really would have been unprecedented for a 'rabbi' to be unmarried? The other Bible college folks I talk to about this don't seem to think it's as big of a deal, but I wonder if they haven't delved in as much as you have to the issue.
Do you happen to have a source for the "teachers (rabbis) are required to be married" from the Mishnah? I tried looking it up online, but no luck. I'm sure if I could find it, it would make my next discussion about this even more interesting. :-)
If I remember the reference quoted it was from the Mishnah; Kiddushin 4:13
There probably is room to interpret the meaning of the word "Teacher" in it; but, I believe the statistics are that it wasn't until the 20th century that rabbis were allowed to remain unmarried.
Teaching the Torah implies that you are following Torah and among the foremost mitzvot is the command to Be Fruitful and Multiply.
My understanding is that some rabbis, after marrying and fulfilling the command, would often leave their families and travel as needed for extended periods of time; in essence being celibate.
Sorry for running off with this on a rabbit trail... my bad!
Post a Comment
<< Home