Tuesday, January 16, 2007

Luke 1:57-80

The Birth of John the Baptist

57When it was time for Elizabeth to have her baby, she gave birth to a son. 58Her neighbors and relatives heard that the Lord had shown her great mercy, and they shared her joy.
59On the eighth day they came to circumcise the child, and they were going to name him after his father Zechariah, 60but his mother spoke up and said, "No! He is to be called John."

61They said to her, "There is no one among your relatives who has that name."

62Then they made signs to his father, to find out what he would like to name the child. 63He asked for a writing tablet, and to everyone's astonishment he wrote, "His name is John." 64Immediately his mouth was opened and his tongue was loosed, and he began to speak, praising God. 65The neighbors were all filled with awe, and throughout the hill country of Judea people were talking about all these things. 66Everyone who heard this wondered about it, asking, "What then is this child going to be?" For the Lord's hand was with him.

Zechariah's Song

67His father Zechariah was filled with the Holy Spirit and prophesied:
68"Praise be to the Lord, the God of Israel,
because he has come and has redeemed his people.
69He has raised up a horn of salvation for us
in the house of his servant David
70(as he said through his holy prophets of long ago),
71salvation from our enemies
and from the hand of all who hate us—
72to show mercy to our fathers
and to remember his holy covenant,
73the oath he swore to our father Abraham:
74to rescue us from the hand of our enemies,
and to enable us to serve him without fear
75in holiness and righteousness before him all our days.
76And you, my child, will be called a prophet of the Most High;
for you will go on before the Lord to prepare the way for him,
77to give his people the knowledge of salvation
through the forgiveness of their sins,
78because of the tender mercy of our God,
by which the rising sun will come to us from heaven
79to shine on those living in darkness
and in the shadow of death,
to guide our feet into the path of peace."
80And the child grew and became strong in spirit; and he lived in the desert until he appeared publicly to Israel.

------------

Old lady Elizabeth gives birth to a son. Note that it's quite a miracle, especially 2000 years ago, for a woman that old to be able to go through nine months of pregnancy and deliver a healthy (living!) child.

Evidently, most kids back then would be named after a relative, so it was odd that Elizabeth wanted to name him John. Zechariah, the father, still couldn't speak, but he writes on a tablet that his son's name should be John. As soon as he does, he can speak again. Everyone is pretty impressed, because he has been mute for the better part of a year. Word gets out to the entire region about this event -- it was a pretty big deal and people were really talking about it. Quite the water cooler conversation, I suppose.

So did you hear about this priest and his wife? They're, like, super old, and they just had a kid. The Dad was stricken mute for the entire pregnancy, apparently by an angel! They named the boy John, and people are saying he's going to be someone really important.

Zechariah's song is next. It's sort of a prayer-slash-prophecy. He begins by praising God, and talking about how God is raising up a savior to save the Jews. Zechariah is remembering events from Israel's history, and talking about prophecies that are going to be fulfilled. He even speaks to his son here:

    "And you, my child, will be called a prophet of the Most High; for you will go on before the Lord to prepare the way for him, to give his people the knowledge of salvation through the forgiveness of their sins..."
Seems like pretty impressive words for a Jewish priest, because most people were still expecting a political or military savior. Not necessarily someone who would "give his people the knowledge of salvation through the forgiveness of their sins."

So the boy grows up and becomes strong. I can just picture this burly, hairy, teenage kid, living in the wilderness, eating locusts and honey. He'll appear again in chapter three.

Thoughts? Some of this makes me wonder about my own children. They're only 3 and 5 now, but what might they be destined for when they grow up? When I was a baby, what did my parents envision for me, later in life?

4 Comments:

At 4:46 PM, January 16, 2007, Blogger Christian Husband said...

Great passage. I have nothing relevant to say about it, just some noodling.

At the end of three of the Gospels are mentioned certain women hanging around the crucifixion. Each of the places these women are listed, the list is different, but not irreconcilably so. Mary Magdalene is listed in all three. Matthew also lists "Mary the mother of James and Joses" and "the mother of Zebeddee's sons". Mark lists "Mary the mother of James and Joses" and someone named Salome. John lists Mary Christ's mother, her sister, and "Mary the wife of Clopas."

Many people assume that there were only four women there and try to match up these various descriptions to see who was who. One particular way of matching them up equates Christ's aunt, Salome, and "the mother of Zebeddee's sons." The sons of Zebeddee are, obviously, the Apostles James and John, so according to this analysis they would both be Christ's cousins. Yet in the passage you are describing here we see relatives of Jesus having a child and naming him John and having people saying, "There is no one in your family with that name." So, either John the Apostle was young enough to be named after his famous cousin John the Baptist (who would had to have been old enough to already be famous by the time John the Apostle was born), or this whole analysis is bunk and the two Apostles were NOT Christ's cousins. Which if that is so makes things a LOT more interesting considering the only other options for who matches up with who.

 
At 2:12 PM, January 17, 2007, Blogger flutterby said...

I think that it's interesting to see numerous examples in these early narratives of people being "filled" with the Holy Spirit.

Now, I've been to Bible College and been taught the old party-line "upon, with and in" theory of the Holy Spirit's working through time. But, honestly I truly question it. It just doesn't seem to be Biblically supported.

But then, I question most of what I learned in Bible College.

Meh.

Oh, XH, consider me obtuse... but could you elaborate on the more interesting matchings you alluded to? I'm just not following. Sounds cryptic! :)

 
At 5:20 PM, January 17, 2007, Blogger Christian Husband said...

Uh, yeah, I'll warn you that it is still totally not relevant to this discussion.

If we assume that there were only four women there -- which is a pretty massive assumption -- then from John we know that we have three women named "Mary" and one without a name listed. That would make Mark's "Salome" have to be Christ's aunt. OK, if we assume the equally unnamed "Mother of Zebedee's sons" is also Salome, then there are two options for who "Mary mother of James the less and Joses" is -- Mary mother of Christ and Mary wife of Clopas. Catholics take this interpretation to let James the less be the son of "Mary wife of Clopas" and therefore not be Christ's literal brother but his cousin. But, if the "Mother of Zebedee's sons" was NOT Salome then the only option is that she is the wife of Clopas meaning that "Mary mother of of James the less and Joses" could only be referring to Christ's mother. Which means that James the "brother of Christ" really was Christ's brother, Mary had more than one kid, and she wasn't a perpetual virgin.

Very sketchy analysis here and I wouldn't trust it to support a feather, but it IS interesting. This is one of only a few passages that give us light into some of the deeper relationships involved. I mean, if the Apostles James and John were Christ's cousins (and also relatives of John the Baptist) then THAT makes a lot of the gospel accounts of them very interesting. We would have to see them in a whole new light. If not, and James the less really was Christ's brother by blood then that, too, is interesting.

But, in the end, it is all speculation. Which is fun but not very meaningful. Catholics try to use this stuff as a proof-text showing that Mary really wasn't the mother of any other kids. OK. It can certainly be interpreted that way. But it doesn't have to be. I only brought it up because I had never really thought before about the whole "nobody in your family has that name" when John the Baptist was named and how that would impact this stuff. Personally, I DO believe that "Mary mother of James the less" was referring to Jesus's mom, but I ALSO believe there was probably more than just four women there and probably more than four being described in those texts, so you can't really prove anything either way.

 
At 11:08 AM, January 22, 2007, Blogger FTN said...

I just think it would be a lot to live up to, being the cousin or brother of Jesus. The family reunions would be interesting, though.

"Oh, we all know Yeshua will get to do the prayer before Thanksgiving dinner again..."

 

Post a Comment

<< Home